Indian Poetics

 This task is based on Indian Poetics and This was assigned by Dilip Barad sir.

Introduction

Indian literary criticism, known by terms such as Sahityasastra, Alamkarshastra, Kavyashastra, and Kavyamimansa, originates in Sanskrit and fundamentally aims to evoke aesthetic pleasure through Rasanubhuti. As one of the earliest and most influential critical traditions, Indian poetics has shaped Sanskrit literature by establishing key theoretical frameworks like Rasa, Vakrokti, Alamkara, Auchitya, and Riti, which offer a deep—तलावगाहन—insight into literary compositions. Since language serves as a vocal symbol with experience-based interpretations that are inherently constrained, literary criticism expands the scope of artistic evaluation. Scholars have meticulously articulated Indian poetics through various theories, each valid within its own context. 

Furthermore, literary creation is intrinsically linked to three forms of imagery: Dream, Memory, and Imagination. While Dream and Memory remain fixed and beyond human control, Imagination plays a pivotal role in enabling artistic expression. Consequently, literature serves as a mirror of human experience, as we inherently seek reflections of our own lives within it. Encompassing multiple schools of thought, Indian aesthetics provides a comprehensive and nuanced approach to poetics, with each school emphasizing distinct aspects of literary theory.

Rasa Theory By Bharata 

Dhvani Theory By Anandvardhana 

Vakrokti Theory By Kuntaka 

Alamkara By Bhamaha 

Riti Theory By Vaman 

Auchitya By Kshemendra

Major schools and Thinkers.......

 

Rasa	Bharata  Dhanika - Dhananjaya
Alamkara	Bhamaha Dandin Udbhata
Riti	Vamana
Dhvani	Anandavardhana Abhinavagupta
Vakrokti	Kuntaka
Guna-Dosa	Dandin Bhamaha
Auchitya	Kshemendra

Dhvani Theory

Among the various schools of Sanskrit literary criticism, the Dhvani or Vyanjana theory occupies a dominant position. Medieval Alaṁkārikās (poetic theorists) asserted that Dhvani is indispensable for aesthetic experience (Rasānubhūti), as the true essence of rasa cannot be achieved merely at the level of explicit statements (Vākyabhūmi). 

"विभाति लावण्यं इवाङ्गनासु"

In the Dhvanyaloka, Anandavardhana explains the concept of Dhvani, stating, "Dhvani is the ultimate essence of language." Dhvani is supreme, and it is the soul of poetry.

In Kavyaprakash, Mammata elaborates on the concept of Shabdashakti (word power) and categorizes it into four types:

1. Abhidha (Denotation): The direct or literal meaning of a word. (Literal meaning)

2. Lakshana (Indication): The indirect or suggestive meaning of a word, which implies a meaning other than the literal one. (Characteristic meaning)

3. Vyanjana (Suggestion): The suggestive or figurative meaning of a word, which conveys a meaning beyond the literal one. (Poetic and metaphysical meaning (Dhvani))

4. Tatparyashakti (Implicative power): The power of words to convey the intended meaning.

These concepts form the foundation of the Dhvani theory, which emphasizes the suggestive and figurative aspects of language in poetry.

The essence of poetry lies in the meaning that captivates refined critics. This meaning has two dimensions:

• Explicit meaning – conveyed through figures of speech (Alaṁkāras).

• Implicit meaning – a subtle charm inherent in great poetry that transcends external embellishments.

In Dhvanyāloka, Ānandavardhana presents Dhvani as the overarching principle that integrates all major aspects of literature:

• Rasa (Aesthetic Experience)

• Alaṁkāra (Figures of Speech)

• Rīti (Style)

• Guṇa-doṣa (Merits and Flaws)

Anandavardhana, in Dhvanyaloka, identifies three primary types of implicit meaning (Dhvani):

1. Vastu Dhvani
2. Alankara Dhvani
3. Rasa Dhvani

In Vastu Dhvani, an uncommon fact or idea is implied. Alankara Dhvani conveys a figure of speech or rhetorical ornament. Rasa Dhvani evokes rasa (aesthetic emotion). Both Vastu Dhvani and Alankara Dhvani can be expressed either through direct meaning (vakyartha) or through suggestion (vyangyartha). However, Rasa Dhvani is unique because it can never be conveyed directly through words.

Rasa Dhvani primarily suggests Bhava—emotions, moods, or sentiments. In this type of Dhvani, emotions are communicated through vyanjaka (suggestion). Unlike abhidha (denotation) and laksana (indication), Rasa is revealed through vyanjaka, and its perception occurs almost simultaneously with the expressed meaning.

The theory of Dhvani is said to have evolved from the ancient principle of Sphota. In literary theory, Sphota refers to the sudden revelation of meaning. The word Sphota is derived from the root ‘sphut,’ meaning manifestation. It signifies bursting forth, expansion, or disclosure. Sphota is considered the eternal and imperceptible element of sound and words. It serves as the true medium through which meaning suddenly flashes into the mind upon hearing a sound.

                                      તુ જ્યાં જશ ત્યાં મારો બીજો જન્મ થશે.

"The word itself becomes the subject of rasa."

Vakrokti Theory

Kuntaka, in his work Vakrokti-Jivitam, emphasized the concept of extraordinary expression in poetry. Vakrokti is defined as "वैदग्ध्य भंगी भनिति", which signifies an artful and graceful mode of expression. Essentially, it emerges from poetic excellence. This means that statements remarkably distinct from Loka-varta (ordinary speech) are classified as Vakrokti. Furthermore, this concept is closely associated with the theory of Aesthetics.

 

 "शब्दार्थौ सहितौ वक्रकाव्यव्यापारशालिनी

 बन्धे व्यवस्थितौ काव्यं तद्विदः आलादकारिणी।"

(શબ્દ અને અર્થ સાથે વક્ર સૌંદર્યથી વિશિષ્ટ રીતે બંધાયેલું તેવું કાવ્ય તેને જાણનારને આનંદ આપે છે.)

Poetry is composed in a structured manner with words and meanings, distinguished by unique artistic beauty, and it delights those who understand it.

Certainly! Let's explore each of Kuntaka’s six stylistic levels with more examples and deeper analysis in both Gujarati and English.

---

1. Phonetic Level (varṇavinyāsa - वर्णविन्यास)

This level focuses on the arrangement of sounds to create beauty and rhythmic impact. Poets carefully select words to produce euphony (pleasant sounds) or cacophony (harsh sounds) depending on the mood.

Examples:

 Example:

Kalidasa in Meghadūta:

"कः संन्यासः श्रेयः किमुपदिशसि प्रोषितपतिम्" 

The repetition of soft syllables like "s" and "sh" creates a melodious, sorrowful effect.

Shakespeare in Macbeth:

"Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn and cauldron bubble."

The repetition of "b" and "t" sounds enhances the eerie, magical tone.

Analysis:

• Soft sounds (like "s" and "sh") create a lyrical, soothing effect.
• Hard sounds (like "k" and "t") evoke harshness, anger, or intensity.

---

2. Lexical Level (padapūrvārddha - पदपूर्वार्द्ध)

This level focuses on word choice, ensuring the use of fresh, non-hackneyed words to enhance poetic impact.

Examples:

🔹 Sanskrit Example:

Kalidasa uses "नीलोत्पलशोभिना जलधरेण" (The cloud shines like a blue lotus) instead of simply calling it "dark" or "stormy."

🔹 Gujarati Example:

Instead of saying "વૃક્ષ ઊંચા છે" (The trees are tall), a poet might say:

"ગગનને અડીને ઊગેલા લીલાં સ્તંભો" (Green pillars kissing the sky).

🔹 Analysis:

• Simple expressions (e.g., "dark cloud") lack poetic depth.
• Uncommon metaphors (e.g., "clouds like blue lotus") enhance imaginative power.

---

3. Grammatical Level (padaparārddha - पदपरार्द्ध)

This level concerns grammatical structure, where poets play with word order, case endings, and sentence formation to create poetic impact.

Examples:

🔹 Sanskrit Example:

Kalidasa in Raghuvaṁśa:

"अस्ति उत्तरस्यां दिशि देवतात्मा हिमालयो नाम नगाधिराजः"

(Normally, "There is a mountain called the Himalayas in the north" → Kalidasa reverses word order to create grandeur.)

🔹  Example:

 "The night was quiet."

Poetic: "Quiet was the night, and still the hours rolled by."

🔹 Analysis:

• Changing word order creates emphasis and musicality.
• Grammatical modifications add beauty to common expressions.

---

4. Sentential Level (vākya - वाक्य)

This level deals with sentence structure and how the arrangement of words affects meaning and aesthetics.

Examples:

 "મારો વિશ્વાસ તૂટ્યો" (My trust is broken).

Poetic: "ટૂટી પડ્યું વિશ્વાસનું કાચબંદ ઘર" (The glass house of trust has shattered).

🔹 English Example:

Normal: "Her smile is beautiful."

Poetic: "Her smile, a moonbeam on the darkest night."

🔹 Analysis:

• Poets rearrange words for rhythm and emotional depth.

---

5. Contextual Level (prakaraṇa - प्रकरण)

This level examines how meaning deepens when words are placed in context.

Examples:

🔹 Sanskrit Example:

In the Mahabharata, Krishna tells Arjuna:

"कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन"

(You have the right to perform your duty, but not to the results.)

• In the battlefield context, these words gain immense philosophical weight.

🔹 English Example:

"Time heals wounds."

Contextual: "Ticking clock, a silent balm on shattered souls."

🔹 Analysis:

• The same words gain deeper meaning in different contexts.

---

6. Compositional Level (prabandha - प्रबन्ध)

This level deals with the overall structure of a literary work, including its title and organization.

Examples:

🔹 Sanskrit Example:

Kalidasa names his work "Meghadūta" (Cloud Messenger), indicating the central theme.

🔹 Gujarati Example:

Book title: "મળે નહીં મીરા" (Cannot Find Meera) – The title itself suggests longing and loss.

🔹 English Example:

George Orwell’s "1984" – A simple year as a title evokes political dystopia.

🔹 Analysis:

• A powerful title sets expectations and reflects originality.
• The arrangement of chapters, tone, and progression define the literary impact.

---

Alankara Theory

The Alankara School traces its origins to the works of Bhamaha and Dandin, who lived around the 6th or 7th century with little time difference between them. Their theories were influenced by the 16th chapter of the Natya Shastra, which provided an early framework for the study of poetics. Both scholars offered simplified and clear perspectives on Alankara and its essential components. They initiated a serious exploration of poetics as an independent discipline, focusing on the virtues of diction, language, and poetic embellishments (Alankara) in Kavya. 

Although Alankara is generally associated with poetics, it also encompasses figures of speech like Anuprasa (alliteration) and Upama (simile), as well as broader literary concepts such as Rasa (aesthetic essence), Guna (merit), and Riti (style) under its domain.

"Alankara is external; where Alankara becomes identifiable, that poetry is not true poetry."

1. Upama (उपमा) – Simile

A simile is a figure of speech that compares two different things using words like "as" or "like" to highlight similarity.

Example : "My love is like a red, red rose."

                   Robert Burns

2. Rupaka (रूपक) – Metaphor

A metaphor is an implicit comparison where one thing is said to be another without using "like" or "as."

Example :"All the world is a stage, and all the men and women merely players."

Shakespeare’s "As You Like It"

3. Atishayokti (अतिशयोक्ति) – Hyperbole or Exaggeration

Atishayokti exaggerates a description for emphasis or dramatic effect.

Example : "એના હસવાથી આખું જગત પ્રકાશિત થઈ ગયું!"

4. Anuprasa (अनुप्रास) – Alliteration

Anuprasa is the repetition of similar sounds or letters in consecutive words to create a rhythmic effect.

Example : "The fair breeze blew, the white foam flew, the furrow followed free."

                  "સાંજ સહેલગી થઈ, સપનાં સજીવન થઈ."

5. Vakrokti (वक्रोक्ति) – Irony or Sarcasm

Vakrokti occurs when words convey a meaning that is opposite to their literal sense, often sarcastically.

Example :  "વાહ! શું ઠંડક છે!"

                   "Yet Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honourable man."

Riti Theory

Acharya Vamana, in his seminal work Kavyalankarasutra, emphasized the concept of Riti (style) as the very essence (Atma) of poetry. Just as every living being has a soul (Atma), Vamana asserted that every poetic composition possesses Riti (रीतिरात्मा काव्यस्य). According to him, Riti is the formless yet defining essence that shapes the artistic expression of poetry.

In literary tradition, Riti initially refers to a pattern or style, which later extends to denote an author’s writing style. The structure of a composition dictates its style—for example, a sonnet is traditionally composed of 14 lines, while a drama is written in dialogue form. Classical poets adhered to specific stylistic traditions, with Kalidasa being renowned for his Vaidarbi Shaili (Vaidarbhi style). Other notable types of Ritis include Panchali, Gaudi, Lati, and Vaidarbhi.

The Riti School, as outlined in the Natyashastra, underscores the significance of style in poetry. It highlights how poetic diction (Riti) fundamentally shapes the composition and artistic merit of a work. Acharya Vamana spearheaded this literary movement, establishing style as a crucial factor in understanding and crafting poetry.

Vamana identified three primary Ritis:

1. Vaidarbhi Riti
2. Gaudi Riti
3. Panchali Riti

These three styles coexist with Visistapadarachana—a refined poetic structure incorporating various Gunas (excellences of composition). Although Vamana acknowledged the importance of Alankaras (poetic embellishments), his primary focus remained on Riti, which he regarded as the soul of Kavya (poetry).

Auchitya Theory

Kshemendra, in his work Kavikanthabharana, introduced the Auchitya (propriety) School of literary thought, emphasizing the importance of appropriateness, justification, and decency in poetry. The concept of Auchitya is rooted in the idea that every element of a poetic composition should align harmoniously with its context and purpose.

The Acharyas define Auchitya as follows:

उचितं प्राहुराचार्याः सदृशं किल यस्य यत्।

उचितस्य च यो भावस्तदौचित्यं प्रचक्षते॥

Kshemendra asserted that Auchitya is the very life force of poetry (Kavyasya Jivitam), particularly when it is infused with Rasa (aesthetic essence). He stated:

"Aucityam rasa siddhasya sthiram kavyasya jivitam."

According to him, Auchitya is the most vital element of Rasa, as it ensures harmony between the expressed words and the suggested emotional essence. He further described Auchitya as a commendable literary virtue (Guna) that enhances poetry, making it more delightful and effective.

Defining Auchitya, Kshemendra explained that when one element naturally complements another or perfectly aligns with it, it is deemed appropriate. He viewed Auchitya as the fundamental principle of poetic composition, where each component should match, balance, and suit its context to fulfill the poet’s intended purpose.

This sense of fittingness or appropriateness ensures that all elements of a literary work are in perfect harmony, creating a unified and aesthetically pleasing composition. Auchitya, therefore, serves as the guiding principle that dictates the proper arrangement of words, emotions, and themes, elevating the impact of poetry.

Ramaniyata School 

                                          "रमणीयार्थप्रतिपादकः शब्दः काव्यम्।"   

"Jagannath is the founder of the Ramaniyata School."

Thank You !

References :

https://dhatriparmar.blogspot.com/2024/03/indian-poetics.html